Bidding Farewell to The Office

On May 16, NBC will broadcast the final episode of The Office, capping a brilliant nine-season run. It’s an occasion that fills me with sadness. There are so many things I loved about The Office, but near the top of the list was its similarity to fiction. The experts tell us that fiction must mirror reality. Writers must avoid contrived stories and characters who are all-good or pure evil. As writers, we strive to create complex, genuine characters with whom our readers can identify and then we put them through crises that transform them. Ultimately, though, our stories must hang together. There has to be logic and coherence to them. Among the many things a novel should make the reader feel is the sense after completing a work of fiction that the events could really happen.

Too many TV shows lack that sense of realism. Either the characters are not authentic or the stories feel manufactured or overblown. Attempts to create pathos badly miss the mark and feel more like bathos. That’s not the case with The Office. In the tradition of the hit show, Cheers, the writers and producers of The Office have created a show with real people—people we know. Many workers have experienced life in a dysfunctional workplace. Many offices have a Michael Scott, the bumbling, endearing boss, a Dwight Schrute, the baldly ambitious underling, a Jim Halpert, the classic underachiever, and the rest.
Recent articles hailed the show as setting a trend toward humor that makes the viewer feel uncomfortable. If that’s a trend, I hope to see more of it. The original British show, created by Ricky Gervais, set the pace for cringe-worthy humor as the boss of the UK plant, David Brent (played brilliantly by Gervais), became more unglued as the series progressed.

Like its British forerunner, the U.S. version is filmed with a single camera and no laugh track or studio audience. The premise of both the British and American versions of The Office is that a film crew is doing a documentary on life in an ordinary office setting. Many of the scenes are followed by off-camera interviews with the participants that often reveal their true feelings—the equivalent of interior monologue in a novel.

One might look at Michael Scott and wonder, how could any boss be such a buffoon? In his own peculiar way, he was a great leader. His constant clown act distracted the workers from the mind-numbing boredom of working in an office for a company that sold paper. He made himself the butt of jokes to take the workers’ minds off the drudgery. He made their office environment fun.

Another winning aspect of The Office was the motivations of the characters. Everybody was working an angle. Dwight wanted the boss’s job. Creed Bratton wanted to do as little work as possible. Angela set out each day to prove she was more virtuous than any of her co-workers. Even the lovable Pam had an angle–she had a crush on Jim.

The Office wasn’t afraid to tackle workplace taboos topics in a way that only it could. The sexual harrasment episode was a prime example. In fact, Michael Scott routinely violated acceptable workplace behavior in the most inappropriate fashion, and got away with it.

There are a handful of other TV shows left where the writers are in touch with every-day life. Modern Family and Parks and Recreation come to mind, but I will really miss The Office.

Advertisements

5 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

5 responses to “Bidding Farewell to The Office

  1. I don’t know why that’s one show I just couldn’t get into. I watched it a couple times– I know people love it. But for some reason it just didn’t hook me. It’s on Netflix; I’ll have to give it another try.

  2. It’s the last of the few recent TV shows we watch: 30 Rock is gone, Scrubs long gone, and Big Bang, fun though it is, seems to have jumped the shark. Amazingly, The Office never did, and I’m sure that’s in part because of those people we were allowed to see at best and worst and in-between. I love that they never let up on the discomfort level and allowed each character to branch out and grow.

  3. Matthew Hallisey

    Well-written analysis of a funny, unique program, Chris. No real-life workplace could ever resemble Dunder Mifflin, could it?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s